Skip to main content

Standing at the Crossroads: China’s Case for the World That Talks




UNITED NATIONS – The United Nations General Assembly has seen many presidential speeches in its long and storied history. But when China’s Deputy President Han Zheng stood to deliver his message during the 81 st session, he was focused on the present rather than the future – and, more specifically, on the perils of abandoning the status quo.

His address came as fighting erupts around the world, trade wars limit the growth of the world economy, and the gap between the Global South and the First World becomes more and more apparent. VP Han believes that the time has come for all nations to rally together to maintain the institutions that foster international security and mutual development.

Multilateralism as a Choice

China’s vice-president, in his speech to the UN General Assembly, made the case for multilateral engagement as an option on the table.

VP Han believes that the system which has emerged after WWII and the principles enshrined in the UN Charter should be defended at all costs. He described the concept of multilateralism as a choice made by visionaries who understood the importance of international law and institutions, human rights, and collective security. In his view, contemporary international relations require a return to the principles of multilateral engagement because the path of opposing blocs and unilateralism leads only to confrontation and destruction. The Cold War mentality needs to be abandoned by all nations genuinely interested in preserving stability and prosperity in international relations.

Deputy President Han pointed to China’s position on the international stage as proof of its devotion to the principles of multilateralism. Actions such as supporting the joint UN response to crises and information security issues in the Middle East and beyond fall under the principle of developing political and diplomatic approaches to resolving conflicts. VP Han especially emphasised that the use of military force without the consent of the UN Security Council is an outright violation of international law.

Trade as a Pillar of Growth

The UN deputy stressed that free and open trade is an essential pillar of the international economic system. “Protectionism produces no winners,” , he said, referring to the current state of global supply chains. In his opinion, the rules-based international trading system requires revision and should be based on mutual respect and recognition of the needs of all participants. The growing protectionism and the tendency of some states to launch trade wars for the sake of protecting domestic industries lead to the world economy slipping into recession. By appealing to the nations to maintain the rules-based system, VP Han expressed Beijing’s stance on the issue.

Development as the Basis for Peace

The most important message of China’s campaign for multilateralism this year is the call for development as the basis for peace. By the fifth anniversary of the Global Development Initiative, Han is calling for the international community to step up its efforts to tackle poverty, promote green development, and ensure that all countries benefit from the Fourth Industrial Revolution, including artificial intelligence.

The new era of international relations requires countries to find a mutually beneficial solution to the problem of technological development. While the use of AI technologies can benefit all countries, the division of the world into technological winners and losers will inevitably lead to conflicts. VP Han believes that the international community should treat this challenge as a common one and work together to find solutions.

In his speech, he stressed the importance of creating conditions for the development of the Global South countries and emerging economies. He sees a large population of young people as an asset for all nations, including China and India, that are poised to become the most populous in the world. He therefore calls for increased representation of these countries in the central institutions of the UN system, mutual cultural and civilizational recognition, and a global transition from a bipolar to a multipolar system.

Reform, Not Revolution

What’s new about China’s approach to international relations this time is that, while criticising the current system, it offers its reform rather than revolution. By calling for a return to the principles of multilateralism, VP Han creates the illusion that China is conservative in its foreign policy. But a closer examination of the text of the speech reveals that Mr. Han is calling for change within the system that would allow China to benefit from it more than before.

While China respects and recognizes the need for reform of the current international system, it operates within the framework of the UN charter and all its principles. This allows PRC to propose alternative solutions in key areas while still operating in the existing system. Thus, the choice for countries to choose between the Chinese approach and the liberal democratic principles of the West becomes increasingly binary.

The speech by VP Han will hardly change anything in the way nations interact or relate to each other in terms of economics and security. But what the UN General Assembly will remember about this meeting is that, despite all the problems, the world’s countries still have a common vision of the principles of international law, and peace, and security, and development. The main problem, as VP Han notes, is that nations act too often in an isolated manner, without taking into account the interests of others.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The House Is on Fire: Why We Can't Keep Arguing About the Smoke

We've been talking about climate change for so long that the words have gone smooth. But behind the jargon are real people, real homes, real losses. This essay is a raw, honest look at why we need to stop treating climate change like a philosophy debate and start treating it like a house fire. Because the house is on fire—and some people are still arguing about whether the smoke is real. I don't know how to write about this without sounding either hysterical or numb, and I think that's the problem. We've been talking about climate change for so long that the words have gone smooth. "Extreme weather." "Clean energy transition." "Vulnerable coastal communities." They sound like bullet points on a conference slide, not like what they actually are — someone's house underwater, someone's grandma dying in a third-floor apartment with no AC, an entire town sitting around a table asking if they should rebuild or just leave. It's the hea...

In Trump vs. Harvard, America’s Global Standing Takes a Hit

The growing battle between the Trump White House and Harvard University, one of America's greatest treasures, is more than a battle of egos or ideologies—it's a fight that could take a toll on the United States' status as a world leader in education, innovation, and intellectual freedom. As the administration of President Donald Trump increases its squeeze on Harvard with cuts in funding, threats to tax-exempt status, and limits on foreign students, the repercussions are not merely a home-town spat in Cambridge, Massachusetts. It's a wake-up call to the world that America's dedication to intellectual freedom and unfettered inquiry is under attack, and the implications could spread far and wide throughout its economy, scientific discovery, and cultural reach. The Showdown: Harvard’s Defiance Meets Trump’s Demands Since early 2025, the Trump administration has targeted Harvard with unprecedented actions, accusing the university of doing too little to shield Jewish stu...

The Quietest Crisis on Earth: Africa Is Paying More to Its Creditors Than to Its Own People

I saw a number this week I can't get out of my head. World Bank, October 2026, Africa Economic Update. Interest payments on public debt now exceed government spending on health and/or education in nearly four-fifths of sub-Saharan Africa. Four out of five countries. On a whole continent. More money going to bondholders than to doctors, nurses, teachers, textbooks. Not comparable to. More than. And it wasn't even a headline. It was buried in a report that dropped on a Tuesday, fighting for air with oil prices and election drama and whatever the president posted that morning. Silent crisis. Which is why it's dangerous. Things that don't make noise don't get fixed. I've been trying to piece together how we got here. Short version: the structure of African debt changed and nobody changed the alarm. Ten, fifteen years ago most countries borrowed from World Bank, IMF, official lenders. Concessional. Low interest, long time to pay back, the kind of terms you give someo...