Skip to main content

The Airport Was Full of Pilgrims. The Missile Didn't Care.



I keep going back to that passenger manifest from Riyadh.

Four Saudis. Two Bangladeshis. One American. One Egyptian. One Jordanian. One Syrian. One Palestinian. One Sudanese.

Twelve people. Seven countries. One terminal at King Khalid International. Same minute. Same blast. 309 injured, some still critical, some probably will not make it through the week.

I keep reading the list because I can't get past how ordinary it is. How unimportant these people were supposed to be. In the best sense of that word.

Not soldiers. Not a base. Not a ministry building. Travelers.

If you've ever been in that airport you know what that hall looks like. Low light, too cold from the AC, that smell of coffee and cleaning fluid. People dragging suitcases with busted wheels. Kids asleep on backpacks. Workers in line to go home to Dhaka after a two-year contract. An American contractor probably in a polo shirt, laptop bag. A Palestinian with a transit visa trying to get to somewhere that will let him in. A Sudanese mother. An Egyptian father. Four Saudis going somewhere, or coming back.

An airport is the most hopeful place in any country. It's where you go to start over. To see your mother after two years. To start a job you lied a little on your resume to get. To take a vacation you saved six months for. For a few hours everyone is reduced to the same condition — tired, impatient, hopeful — a person with a ticket and somewhere to be.

Someone decided to turn that into a target.

The Houthis haven't formally claimed this specific one yet but the claim almost doesn't matter. Context does it for them. This comes after days of missile and drone strikes on Saudi airports and facilities. Riyadh airport, Abha, Jizan, again and again. The Saudi-led coalition already put out its statement — "firm" response coming. So we know how this script goes. Strike, condemnation, retaliation, escalation, another strike. Same loop we've watched for years, now with a bigger blast radius and a more brazen target.

What makes this different is not the number. Twelve dead is less than a lot of days in this war. What makes it different is the place.

An airport is civilian infrastructure. Not dual-use, not arguable. It's protected under every law of war that anyone pretended to care about. Attacking it is not a military operation. It doesn't degrade the other side's ability to fight. It just tells ordinary people: you are not safe anywhere.

Not your hospital. Not your school. Not your power grid. Not the terminal where you were waiting to pick up your brother.

If you're a Saudi citizen, a Bangladeshi worker, an American engineer, a Palestinian refugee, a Sudanese nurse — you are fair game. The missile doesn't check your passport at the door. It doesn't care about your politics or your religion or whether you supported anyone. It just kills whoever happens to be standing in the wrong place at the wrong second.

I think about the arrivals hall. You know that moment. Everyone crowded behind the barrier, holding signs, phones up, kids on shoulders. That two-second gap between normal and not normal anymore. One minute you're complaining the flight is late. Next minute you're on the floor.

And I know exactly how the next 72 hours go because we've all memorized it now.

First: the condemnation statements. "We condemn in the strongest terms." US, EU, UN, everyone.

Then: Security Council meeting called, no resolution.

Then: promise of retaliation. Precision strikes.

Then: headlines for two days, then airport reopens, flights resume, we move on. Because what else do we do? We have to move on.

The injured will recover or they won't. The families of the twelve will bury them in seven different countries, with seven different rites, and the world will have already moved to the next thing. That's the worst part — how efficient we have become at absorbing this.

We have quietly normalized that civilian infrastructure is a legitimate battleground. Airports, hospitals, water treatment plants, power stations. We decided, without ever voting on it, that rules of war are suggestions and the only thing that matters is who has the bigger missile and better air defense.

I don't know how you stop a group like the Houthis. I don't know how you de-escalate a regional war that has already pulled in Iran, Saudi Arabia, the US, and a dozen others, each with their own proxy and grievance and domestic audience. I know there are smart people right now in Riyadh and Tehran and Washington drawing circles on maps.

But I also know what doesn't work. Every time we answer an attack like this with more strikes, more bombs, more dead, we feed the machine. The machine that needs bodies to justify its budget. The machine that turns ordinary people into the phrase "collateral damage" so we don't have to say their names. The machine that makes sure the next attack is already being assembled in a warehouse while we're still counting the dead from this one.

Those twelve people at King Khalid weren't important people. That's the whole point. That's why it should haunt us.

They weren't generals. They weren't politicians. They weren't diplomats who knew the risk.

They were just people doing the most ordinary, human thing in the world: traveling. Going home. Leaving home. Waiting for someone who was going home.

And someone decided that was enough reason to kill them.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Some People Face Justice and Others Stay Untouchable

International law isn't equally enforced. It's enforced against whoever can't resist it. And pretending otherwise doesn't fix the problem. There's a question I keep coming back to whenever I read the news about international law. Why is it that some people can be accused of the most serious crimes in the world and still carry on as if nothing has happened, while others end up in court, in prison, or fighting for their lives? I've been thinking about it while following the stories about the ICC, the sanctions, the arrest warrants and the deals being made behind closed doors. And the more I look at it, the harder it becomes to ignore an uncomfortable reality. International law is supposed to apply to everyone. But the ability to enforce it often depends on how much power someone has to resist it. I know that sounds cynical. And I don't want this to become one of those arguments where we shrug our shoulders and say the whole system is corrupt, so there's no...

Crypto Crime Turns Violent: France Charges 25 in Kidnapping Plots Targeting the Industry

  France is grappling with a dark string of crime that's putting its young cryptocurrency industry in shock. French authorities indicted 25 suspects, six of them minors, on May 31, 2025, as part of a bloody string of kidnappings and attempted kidnappings of crypto co-founders and their relatives. This attack, intended to combat a surging wave of real-world violence that has leaked over from the virtual realm, is a chilling warning to the crypto space: cryptocurrency money is making individuals targets in the real world. Having an interest in tracking the meteoric path of cryptocurrency with both fascination and trepidation, I am concerned about this trend. Let's break down what is occurring in France, why the space of crypto is under attack, and what that portends for the future of digital finance. A Spree of Violent Attacks The abductions started at the beginning of the year, with at least five attempts made in 2025 alone. The first of the high-profile kidnappings was on 21 Ja...

There Are Two Notre-Dames Now. One Is Made of Stone. The Other Is Made of Data.

France is scanning its cathedrals, restoring its paintings with AI film, and digitizing 25 million documents. It's calling it preservation. It's a backup. There are two Notre-Dames now. One is made of stone and oak and lead, and it nearly burned to the ground in 2019. The other is made of data, and it already existed before the fire — which is the only reason we know exactly what the first one looked like. The second Notre-Dame is the one you can walk through on a laptop. The first one is the one that matters. Livio De Luca, research director at the CNRS, led this wild, sprawling team that built what they call a "digital twin." It's not a pretty render. It's a collaborative platform, a kind of Google Earth for Notre-Dame. You click on a beam in the roof frame and you get everything attached to it — dendro dating, analysis of charred wood, 3D scans, old photos. It's designed to keep absorbing information forever. Not an image. A memory palace made of point ...